Many people have sent e-mails, and thoughts regarding this.
We need your thoughts and questions on this. Please take a moment, and jot them down in an email to tom@maddenfamily.org
While many of the comments will follow the themes of noise, traffic, aesthetics of the building, etc… some people have surprised me with additional points. The fact that we had an audiologist testify at the meeting was amazing.
Its critical that you attend the meeting to stop this. It would be great if you’d get up and speak, but I realize many people don’t feel comfortable doing that. But we still need your thoughts on the matter.
Such as:
– Why are we second guessing a master plan that has served the town well for decades? Yes, you are required to revisit the master plan periodically, however, you are NOT required to change it!
– Why are you spending township consulting resources to entertain this change, simply because Mr Catena asked (as noted in the last planning meeting)? Is Mr Catena paying for the township engineers report on the impact ? (not implying a bad thing, just that the town shouldn’t be)
– Many of the candidates state they are against over development and preserving open spaces. Why don’t you realize that over development is not only residential? Yes, houses do put a strain on infrastructure, but so will this!
– What are the planning boards guiding principles in making development decisions?
We need more of these types of questions. Again, it would be fantastic if each person would ask these questions individually, but if you know you’re not, still make yourself heard.